The popult inflation that emerg everywhere in Europe in the worl avances h in h with the swell of ientity claims.
Iron masks try to cover the precariousness of contemporary extences. More or less constent veils to mask the elusive ientity, of structure. Of the subject.
Fac with th necessarily suctive surge in that it combines a response to the fall of the ieologies or institutions that mesh extence a tenency of the speak be to shelter in the hollow of a reay-to-wear garment always baly cut by the Other, what can psychoanalys o little papers ?
The answers provi by two of the
privileg places where h orientation transmitt. The teach evens of the Analysts of the School. The epartment of Psychoanalys of Par 8 – more particularly the stuy ay of January 9.
are strik in their great mobile atabase proximity as in the eep imbrication that we hear there between clinic evelop a lt of eptemology. These are answers that start from the aily practice of analyss analysts whose esire has l them to be hear beyon th clos circle. To circumscribe push back on a aily bas, moestly, the constitutive withrawal of toay’s malae.
They reveal to what extent our
ientities are “mae of paper” to use Marie-Hélène . Brousse’s azzl image. hat, if paper sticks, can last, it only for a time. That no longer believ har as iron in the mask, as the AEs teach us. To prefer to use it like paper that cut: in small pieces.
to extract the movement, that of a “liv matter” as Sonia Chiriaco nicely bett email lt puts it, which experienc in an analys.
But also when it carri to its conclusion, in the cussions of the AEs who grope. Again afterwars, expose their movements. n’t th the heart of what psychoanalys teaches us? To shift from what always consts, too much, after hav ientifi its mark, to prefer grop.